September 4, 2010

Marriage Penalty Hidden in Health Care Reform

by Kim Trobee, editor


Higher premiums may discourage people from getting married.


A closer look at premium payments in both the House and Senate health care bills shows higher premiums that might discourage couples tying the knot.


For instance, in the House version, an unmarried couple each making $30,000 a year would pay $1,320 combined each year for private health insurance. If that couple chose to marry, their premium would jump to $12,000 a year, a difference of $10,680....

                     * * *  * * *   *   * * *  * * *
Allen Quist, a former Minnesota State legislator and current candidate for Congress, discovered the penalty while looking at numbers from the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy & Commerce, and Education & Labor.


"This extraordinary penalty people will pay, should they marry, extends all the way from a two-person combined income of $58,280 to $86,640, a spread of $28,360," he wrote in a blog post.  "A large number of people fall within this spread. As premiums for private insurance escalate, as expected, the marriage penalty will become substantially larger."
The Senate bill includes a similar penalty.


"The Senate bill stipulates that two unmarried people, 52 years of age, with private insurance and a combined income of $60,000, $30,000 each, will pay a combined cost of $2,483 for medical insurance," Quist wrote.  "Should they marry, however, they will pay a combined cost of $11,666 for insurance — a penalty of $9,183 for getting married."


The numbers are based on the government's definition of "poverty level."  Those above poverty level will pay higher premiums, and the excess would be redistributed to those in lower income levels.


Quist explains that the government's definitions will play a critical role in whether people will choose to get married.
"'Household' is defined in both bills as including those who can be claimed as dependents for federal income tax purposes, thereby clarifying that adults can avoid the marriage penalty by living together unmarried," he wrote.  "The new system provides a huge incentive for doing so."


John Helmberger, CEO of the Minnesota Family Council and Institute, said the middle class will once again take the hit financially.

"This hidden marriage penalty," he said, "hits hardest the very people that are most suffering from the pathologies resulting from the decline of marriage in our culture."

 


"History is important.  Why?  History is nothing less than the outworking of God's eternal decree in time.  History has a definite beginning and a definite ending.  All history is God's history.  If you want to understand the issues of today, you must grasp the issues of yesterday.  Here in America the South has always contended for righteousness and truth, why?  Why is the South known as the Bible belt?  The principles for which the South contended in 1776 and in 1861 are the same principles that are being contended for today."   ~Pastor John Weaver, History and Southern Heritage, DominionMinistry.com


Polls

Which answer best describes your stand on the war in Iraq?
 

Polls

Constitution I.Q.? Take the Quiz bottom of page, check how you did, click VOTE.
 

Polls

Do you support or oppose posting the Ten Commandments in public schools and other public places?
 
What can you do to help restore the American Republic? Visit Institute on the Constitution.